<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NAS Storage Server &#187; ZFS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nasstorageserver.com/category/zfs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nasstorageserver.com</link>
	<description>NAS Servers, Systems &#38; Storage Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:03:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>KQ ZFS no longer actively being worked on &#8211; ZFS on Linux</title>
		<link>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2011/10/03/kq-zfs-no-longer-actively-being-worked-on-zfs-on-linux/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2011/10/03/kq-zfs-no-longer-actively-being-worked-on-zfs-on-linux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 06:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[File Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZFS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasstorageserver.com/?p=956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ZFS file system didn&#8217;t get ported to Linux for a long time as its source-code is distributed under the CDDL license, which is incompatible with the GNU GPL, therefore making it impossible to integrate it into the mainline Linux kernel. However, KQ Infotech, and Indian tech company, ported the ZFS file-system to Linux as an out-of-tree kernel [...]<p><a href="http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2011/10/03/kq-zfs-no-longer-actively-being-worked-on-zfs-on-linux/">KQ ZFS no longer actively being worked on &#8211; ZFS on Linux</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.networkattacheddatastorage.com">NAS, SANs and Storage Server Technology</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2011/10/03/kq-zfs-no-longer-actively-being-worked-on-zfs-on-linux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Run ZFS on Linux</title>
		<link>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2011/02/08/run-zfs-on-linux/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2011/02/08/run-zfs-on-linux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ZFS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasstorageserver.com/?p=733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although ZFS exists in an operating system whose future is at risk, it is easily one of the most advanced, feature-rich file systems in existence. It incorporates variable block sizes, compression, encryption, de-duplication, snapshots, clones, and (as the name implies) support for massive capacities. Get to know the concepts behind ZFS and learn how you [...]<p><a href="http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2011/02/08/run-zfs-on-linux/">Run ZFS on Linux</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.networkattacheddatastorage.com">NAS, SANs and Storage Server Technology</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2011/02/08/run-zfs-on-linux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>zxfer – a handy ZFS tool</title>
		<link>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2011/02/03/zxfer-%e2%80%93-a-handy-zfs-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2011/02/03/zxfer-%e2%80%93-a-handy-zfs-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ZFS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasstorageserver.com/?p=722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[zxfer, available under the BSD license,  is a really handy and much promising ZFS tool. It transfer ZFS filesystems, snapshots, properties, files and directories, which can be done with a single command, while having similar end-to-end assurance of data integrity as the ZFS filesystem itself. Some more detailed features are: recursive transfer of filesystems minimal dependencies. [...]<p><a href="http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2011/02/03/zxfer-%e2%80%93-a-handy-zfs-tool/">zxfer – a handy ZFS tool</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.networkattacheddatastorage.com">NAS, SANs and Storage Server Technology</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2011/02/03/zxfer-%e2%80%93-a-handy-zfs-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ZFS data integrity tested</title>
		<link>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2010/02/27/oracle-zfs-data-integrity-tested/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2010/02/27/oracle-zfs-data-integrity-tested/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ZFS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasstorageserver.com/?p=624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robin Harris over at the ZDnet.com Storage Bits blog analyses a new UW-M paper analyzing the fault tolerance claims of ZFS: &#8220;File systems guard all the data in your computer, but most are based on 20-30 year old architectures that put your data at risk with every I/O. The open source ZFS from Sun Oracle [...]<p><a href="http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2010/02/27/oracle-zfs-data-integrity-tested/">ZFS data integrity tested</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.networkattacheddatastorage.com">NAS, SANs and Storage Server Technology</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2010/02/27/oracle-zfs-data-integrity-tested/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iXsystems iX-N4236 Orion II Server Series</title>
		<link>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2010/02/23/ixsystems-ix-n4236-orion-ii-server-series/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2010/02/23/ixsystems-ix-n4236-orion-ii-server-series/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZFS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasstorageserver.com/?p=615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Orion II Storage Server &#38; JBOD Storage Expansion Deliver Unparalleled Storage Density With Redundant Cooling and Powerful Intel® Technologies iXsystems have released the iX-N4236 Orion II Storage Server which is designed to handle storage-intensive tasks while remaining at an optimal temperature and drawing less power than other servers in its class. The Orion II&#8217;s [...]<p><a href="http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2010/02/23/ixsystems-ix-n4236-orion-ii-server-series/">iXsystems iX-N4236 Orion II Server Series</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.networkattacheddatastorage.com">NAS, SANs and Storage Server Technology</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2010/02/23/ixsystems-ix-n4236-orion-ii-server-series/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FreeNAS on Debian = no ZFS</title>
		<link>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/11/27/freenas-on-debian-no-zfs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/11/27/freenas-on-debian-no-zfs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FreeNAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZFS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corenas.org/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to license restrictions, Sun&#8217;s Zetabyte File System (ZFS) cannot be ported over to Linux. Though many are welcoming a Debian-based FreeNAS, the absense of ZFS gives reason for great disappointment: ZFS was the only reason to use FreeNAS. That was the USP of the product. No ZFS in Linux means I&#8217;ll just migrate to [...]<p><a href="http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/11/27/freenas-on-debian-no-zfs/">FreeNAS on Debian = no ZFS</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.networkattacheddatastorage.com">NAS, SANs and Storage Server Technology</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/11/27/freenas-on-debian-no-zfs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple shuts down ZFS open source project</title>
		<link>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/11/18/apple-shuts-down-zfs-open-source-project/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/11/18/apple-shuts-down-zfs-open-source-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ZFS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkattacheddatastorage.com/?p=536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple&#8216;s efforts to support the development of ZFS, an advanced file system originally created by Sun, were officially terminated today in a notice posted by MacOS Forge. The tersely worded message only stated that &#8220;The ZFS project has been discontinued. The mailing list and repository will also be removed shortly.&#8221; &#8230; Apple&#8217;s interest in porting [...]<p><a href="http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/11/18/apple-shuts-down-zfs-open-source-project/">Apple shuts down ZFS open source project</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.networkattacheddatastorage.com">NAS, SANs and Storage Server Technology</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/11/18/apple-shuts-down-zfs-open-source-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FreeNAS Bash script for ZFS scrubbing</title>
		<link>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/08/29/freenas-bash-script-zfs-scrub/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/08/29/freenas-bash-script-zfs-scrub/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[File Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZFS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkattacheddatastorage.com/?p=474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gimpe has put together a bash script to automatically run a script at predifined intervals to do a scrub on each ZFS pool. Please note, this will only run on FreeNAS 0.7 (not on the 0.6x series as it doesn&#8217;t support Sun&#8217;s Zetabyte Filesystem (ZFS). View/Download the script from hypeothetic.com FreeNAS Bash script for ZFS [...]<p><a href="http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/08/29/freenas-bash-script-zfs-scrub/">FreeNAS Bash script for ZFS scrubbing</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.networkattacheddatastorage.com">NAS, SANs and Storage Server Technology</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/08/29/freenas-bash-script-zfs-scrub/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>btrfs: a brief comparison with ZFS</title>
		<link>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/07/31/btrfs-comparison-vszfs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/07/31/btrfs-comparison-vszfs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[File Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZFS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkattacheddatastorage.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lwn.net has an overview of the history of the btrfs filesystem (wikipedia link). He also touches on the  difference and similarities between btrf and ZFS, Sun&#8217;s Zetabyte File System, something that I was most intersted in: &#8220;People often ask about the relationship between btrfs and ZFS. From one point of view, the two file systems [...]<p><a href="http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/07/31/btrfs-comparison-vszfs/">btrfs: a brief comparison with ZFS</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.networkattacheddatastorage.com">NAS, SANs and Storage Server Technology</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/07/31/btrfs-comparison-vszfs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SUN ZFS Triple-Parity RAID-Z</title>
		<link>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/07/29/sun-zfs-triple-parity-raid-z/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/07/29/sun-zfs-triple-parity-raid-z/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[File Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZFS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkattacheddatastorage.com/?p=331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The standard in the RAID industry for storage is RAID-6, with recovery from a double drive failure. But it&#8217;s not going to be good enough as disk capacities increase, prolonging failed disk rebuild times and so lengthening the window of unrecoverable failure if a third disk fails before the recovery from a double drive failure is [...]<p><a href="http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/07/29/sun-zfs-triple-parity-raid-z/">SUN ZFS Triple-Parity RAID-Z</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.networkattacheddatastorage.com">NAS, SANs and Storage Server Technology</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nasstorageserver.com/2009/07/29/sun-zfs-triple-parity-raid-z/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

